Why We Need To Stop Adding Letters To The ‘LGBT’ Term

Dear Gay People,

Once upon a time, we were simply known as the LGBT community and everyone was happy. The LGBT acronym was effective in the sense that it was easy to remember, received widespread acceptance and managed to cover a sufficiently broad spectrum of sexual orientations (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender).

LGBT
Source: yocityindia.com

Unfortunately, the LGBT term soon came under fire for not being inclusive enough as an increasing number of people were unable to define themselves on the spectrum of sexualities provided by the LGBT acronym. And so, some bright geniuses came up with the idea to simply add extra letters to the LGBT term in order to keep everyone happy.

problem solved
Source: totallytaylor-gifs.tumblr.com

Except the problem wasn’t solved and what was originally intended as a solution became the cause of more problems instead. Those bright geniuses who came up with the solution of adding extra letters probably never anticipated just how many extra letters would be needed and before we knew it, the LGBT term became LGBTQQIP2SAA instead. The extra letters stood for:

Q: Queer. A pointless attempt to take back a derogatory term meant for gay and lesbian people.

Q: Questioning. This term just further fuels the misconception that a person’s sexuality is a choice. Also, if you don’t know what to label yourself as, then just don’t label yourself!

I: Inter-sex: The condition of being intermediate between male and female; hermaphroditism.

P: Pansexual: Someone who is not limited in sexual choice with regard to biological sex, gender, or gender identity.

2S: Two Spirit: A culturally distinct gender that describes Indigenous North Americans who fulfils one of many mixed gender roles found traditionally among many Native Americans and Canadian First Nations indigenous groups.

A: Asexual: Someone who lacks, or completely doesn’t have any sexual attraction to anyone.

A: Allies: THIS IS NOT EVEN A SEXUAL ORIENTATION!!! Yes, straight allies play an important role in the community but it’s quite unnecessary to reward them with an extra letter to recognise their contributions.

this is ridiculous
Source: sharegif.com

Of course, I wasn’t the only one who found it ridiculous and soon, people were having pointless debates over what the LGBT community should call itself. The reason why I called the debates ‘pointless’ was because it was one of those debates that would never be able to arrive at a universal consensus.

You see, labels by itself are problematic by nature. While I completely understand the need for an appropriate descriptor term that minorities can identify themselves with, the result is often overly politically correct and incredibly awkward. For example, people with disabilities had different labels handed to them ranging from ‘handicapped’ to ‘disabled’ to the very awkwardly sounding ‘differently abled’. It’s that same kind of awkward political correctness that’s currently causing the pointless debates over what acronym the LGBT community should call themselves.

Unfortunately, the answer to that is that there’s never going to be an  acronym that is sufficiently wide enough to be able to cover every single sexual orientation and minority out there. If we were to accede to the calls to be inclusive for inclusiveness sake, the LGBT label is going to one day stretch to become something along the lines of LGBTQQIP2SAAXYZPJSM.

oh hell no
Source: giphy.com

And that is why we should just stick to the LGBT term which has already seeped into the public consciousness to gain widespread acceptance. For a community that fights so hard against labels, it’s pretty ironic that we feel such a strong need to label ourselves. Instead of taking the LGBT term literally, the LGBT acronym should instead be seen as an umbrella term that covers any and all sexual and gender minorities that deviate from the heterosexual norm. Straight people have enough trouble comprehending any sexuality that deviates from heterosexuality there really is no need to confuse them any further.

At the end of the day, we are all just trying to make this world a better place and that is what we should all be focusing on instead. So that’s why I believe that we need to stop adding letters to the LGBT term or we might as well just add the entire alphabet in there!

You might also like to read:

10 Sexual Orientations You’ve Probably Never Heard Of

Move Over Homophobia, It’s Time To Talk About Biphobia

Ok Fine, Homosexuality Is Totally A Choice!

If you like what you read, like us on Facebook and sign up for our mailing list to get the latest updates!

 

Advertisements

5 comments

  1. Couldnt agree more. LGBT covers the whole range of sexual orientations and genders with bisexual implying anything more than a single gender attraction and transgender that implies any deviation from your birth gender.

    LGBT is comprehensive and more importantly short acronym as you said. The LGBT acronym does not perfectly describe everyone in the community but it does a pretty good job. However more importantly it already has brand recognition with the public and is short enough to be easily remembered. Changing the acronym ruins that brand recognition with the public and adding more letters simply makes it harder to remember.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I don’t like LGBT as a term anyway.
    Putting different groups together in one box that may have no relationship to each other I find offensive.

    Like

  3. Hi I know you guys won’t like this but I like the term faggot and before you get all up in arms about it let me explain. So I am gay myself and honestly I feel like calling somebody a fag is yes offensive but more like calling somebody straight a prick or a whore, I mean it’s not nice but it is a descriptive term for when somebody is being too far into their stereotypes, for example a guy being a prick would be a total jock douche, aka the stereotypical qualities of a man but amplified in a negative way. In my opinion fag is the gay equivalent, in the end it is a fun swear word that we shouldn’t give so much power by being offended, just my opinion have a nice day.

    Like

  4. “Straight people have enough trouble comprehending any sexuality that deviates from heterosexuality there really is no need to confuse them any further”

    What patronising rubbish, and I say this as a gay man. I did my bit for gay rights in Ireland in the 1990’s (when it was still illegal). The hard work has already been done.

    The young generation almost seem disappointed that they’re not being oppressed and have to invent ever more ridiculous identities in order to have to ‘battle’ the rest of society. Get over yourselves and just live your lives instead of looking for attention.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s